[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: patches, source trees and random code
- Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2000 10:22:01 -0600 (CST)
- From: Jay Jacobs <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Subject: Re: patches, source trees and random code
I'd vote for a summary of the patches on the list at least... like what
exactly is the "ambivalence" patch? What are the other things you've come
On Sun, 12 Nov 2000, Rob Partington wrote:
> What's the best way to send a patch? I've got a small patch that
> allows "ambivalence" if you do "something+-"
> I have other patches that are actually useful (to me). Is it a good
> idea to bring the ideas up on here first as a sanity check, or just go
> right ahead and code?
> At the moment, the ambivalence patch is linked off a web page as
> "diff -urP" patches. There are two versions -- one against the 0.44.3
> source, and one against the CVS source off sourceforge (checked out
> today). No patch for 0.49.03 yet, though.
> Which is the more sensible tree to patch against, or is it better to
> hedge my bets and do all of them?
> Sorry for all the questions; the mailing list archive on infobot.org
> didn't really clear anything up for me.
> rob partington % email@example.com % http://frottage.org/rjp/